Internet-Draft | MPLS-TE Topology YANG Model | April 2022 |
Busi, et al. | Expires 30 October 2022 | [Page] |
This document describes a YANG data model for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) with Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) networks.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 30 October 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
This document describes a YANG data model for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) with Traffic Engineering (MPLS-TE) networks.¶
This document also defines a collection of common data types and groupings in YANG data modeling language for MPLS-TE networks. These derived common types and groupings are intended to be imported by the MPLS-TE topology model, defined in this document, as well as by the MPLS-TE tunnel model, defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls].¶
Multi-Protocol Label Switching - Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) is a profile of the MPLS protocol that is used in packet switched transport networks and operated in a similar manner to other existing transport technologies (e.g., OTN), as described in [RFC5921]. The YANG model defined in this document can also be for MPLS-TP networks.¶
A simplified graphical representation of the data model is used in Section 5.1 of this this document. The meaning of the symbols in these diagrams is defined in [RFC8340].¶
In this document, names of data nodes and other data model objects are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the corresponding YANG imported modules, as shown in Table 1.¶
Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
---|---|---|
rt-types | ietf-routing-types | [RFC8294] |
tet | ietf-te-topology | [RFC8795] |
tet-pkt | ietf-te-topology-packet | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo] |
te-packet-types | ietf-te-packet-types | [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo] |
mte-types | ietf-mpls-te-types | This document |
tet-mpls | ietf-te-mpls-topology | This document |
The module ietf-mpls-te-types contains the following YANG types and groupings which can be reused by MPLS-TE YANG models:¶
load-balancing-type:¶
This identify defines the types of load-balancing algorithms used on bundled MPLS-TE link.¶
te-mpls-label-hop:¶
This grouping is used for the augmentation of TE label for MPLS-TE path.¶
The MPLS-TE technology specific topology model augments the ietf-te- topology-packet YANG module, defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo], which in turns augment the generic ietf-te-topology YANG module, defined in [RFC8795], as shown in Figure 1.¶
Given the guidance for augmentation in [RFC8795], the following technology-specific augmentations need to be provided:¶
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types/tet:te-topology /tet-pkt:packet: +--rw mpls-topology!¶
Note: TE Bandwidth Augmentations for paths, LSPs and links are provided by the ietf-te-topology-packet module, defined in [I-D.ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo].¶
In MPLS-TE, the label allocation is done by NE, information about label values availability is not necessary to be provided to the controller. Moreover, MPLS-TE tunnels are currently established within a single domain.¶
Therefore this document does not define any MPLS-TE technology-specific augmentations, of the TE Topology model, for the TE label since no TE label related attributes should be instantiated for MPLS-TE Topologies.¶
Open issue: shall this module allows the setup of MPLS-TE multi-domain tunnels?¶
Multi-Protocol Label Switching - Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) is a profile of the MPLS protocol that is used in packet switched transport networks and operated in a similar manner to other existing transport technologies (e.g., OTN), as described in [RFC5921].¶
Therefore YANG model defined in this document can also be applicable for MPLS-TP networks.¶
However, as described in [RFC5921], MPLS-TP networks support bidirectional LSPs and require no ECMP and no PHP. When reporting the topology for an MPLS-TP network, additional information is required to indicate whether the network support these MPLS-TP characteristics.¶
It is worth noting that [RFC8795] is already capable to model TE topologies supporting either unidirectional or bidirectional LSPs: all bidirectional TE links can support bidirectional LSPs and all the links can support unidirectional LSPs and it is always possible to associated unidirectional LSPs as long as they belong to the same tunnel.¶
When setting up bidirectional LSPs (e.g., MPLS-TP LSPs) only bidirectional TE Links are selected by path computation.¶
In order to allow reporting that ECMP is not affecting forwarding the packets of a given LSP, the load-balancing-type attribute reports whether a LAG or TE Bundled Link performs load-balancing on a per-flow or per-top-label:¶
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/tet:te: +--rw load-balancing-type? mte-types:load-balancing-type¶
When setting up LSPs which do not requires ECMP (e.g., MPLS-TP LSPs) only Links that are not part of a LAG or TE Bundle or that performs per-top-label load balancing are selected by path computation.¶
It is assumed that almost all the MPLS-TE nodes are capable to support Ultimate Hop Popping (UHP). However, if some interfaces are not able to support UHP, they can report it in the MPLS-TE topology:¶
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point /tet:te: +--ro uhp-incapable? empty¶
When setting up LSPs which do not requires PHP (e.g., MPLS-TP LSPs) only the interfaces (LTPs) which are capable to support UHP in the destination node are selected by path computation.¶
To be added.¶
To be added.¶
We thank Loa Andersson for providing useful suggestions for this draft.¶
This document was prepared using kramdown.¶
Previous versions of this document was prepared using 2-Word-v2.0.template.dot.¶